Concourse & Jira DC Portal


Your feedback drives the Concourse roadmap! Review and vote for existing ideas or submit new ideas.


For immediate technical support, please follow this guidance to open a Service Now ticket.

PM block - assets review

This asset in the PM block is branded by a third party (PM2). Is it a best practice to use such a template in managing projects in PwC? It would be great to perform a review of assets in the Mandatory blocks to ensure high-quality high-value-add effectiveness-boosting ones are in place.


The work item name is "Program/Project Closure Stage Gate". It has three assets. As a practitioner I would prefer to have one Golden Standard asset instead.


https://pwceur.sharepoint.com/:w:/r/sites/GBL-ADV-ConnectedSource/_layouts/15/Doc.aspx?sourcedoc=%7B24ED7067-6F8F-4499-9971-EE6F450B2825%7D&file=(OPM2-33.C.TPL.v3.0.1).Project_End_Report.(ProjectName).(dd-mm-yyyy).(vx.x)_redacted%20PA_f11534a6-41c3-4420-9870-7bffad5907ca.docx&action=default&mobileredirect=true

  • Guest
  • Aug 14 2025
  • Working as Designed
  • Admin
    Anamaria Giraldo-Gomez commented
    29 Aug 19:43

    Hi @Aleksandra Yujaninova - we truly appreciate your patience and hope you're doing well.

    Thanks for the feedback. We understand the concern raised about the use of third-party-branded templates in the PM block. The assets currently mapped to the PMO Building block were curated in coordination with the PMO building block global driver and have already gone through a formal rationalization and approval process.

    That said, we appreciate your perspective and will continue to keep this type of feedback in mind as we evolve the asset set. If you have recommendations for alternate or improved templates, feel free to share them. We’re always open to enhancing the quality and relevance of assets in PDM.

    Attachments Open full size

Related ideas