Your feedback drives the Concourse roadmap! Review and vote for existing ideas or submit new ideas.
For immediate technical support, please follow this guidance to open a Service Now ticket.
No one liked working on map files. I thought switching to Concourse and Save-It would improve all the areas of work including map file efforts. However, the risk management tasks and subtasks in delivery maps actually makes the RM process more awkward and confusing given the requirements language used in the Concourse tasks and subtasks.
Many PwC tools are integrating with one another to avoid duplication of efforts/promote efficiency. I think the same should be done with the engagement and risk management tools so that the details would integrate into Concourse for easy sharing into Save-It. This would eliminate the confusing language and the concern about "Did I do this right? Am I missing anything?"
The screenshot below includes a dropdown menu of the tools that would be nice to have integrated with Concourse. The outputs of those tools would then be saved automatically into Save-It without the need to attach exported artifacts. (e.g. FlexForeceast budgets, invoices generated, invoices paid, SOWs, any risk-related documentation, etc.)
Guest
Agreed with Casey - more than half of our "Not started" items are OFRO based. This makes it more difficult to understand how far along we are in the project, and undersells our progress when we report based on the status of deliverable items.
Integration with the EAF or being able to add risk management information to the Settings section of Concourse would be helpful in relation the 'risk management tools' portion of this feedback
Thank you for submitting this idea! We’ve established a Concourse research team that is completely focused on exploring user generated ideas like this. I've assigned this to our Concourse research team and they will be in touch as they explore this idea further!